HOME    SEARCH    ABOUT US    CONTACT US    HELP   
           
Rule: 23.13.720 Prev     Up     Next    
Rule Title: CONTESTED CASES, SETTLEMENT OR STIPULATION AND PROCESS FOR REVIEW BY THE POST COUNCIL
Add to My Favorites
Add to Favorites
Department: JUSTICE
Chapter: PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING (POST)
Subchapter: Revocation/Suspension of Certification
 
Latest version of the adopted rule presented in Administrative Rules of Montana (ARM):

Printer Friendly Version

23.13.720    CONTESTED CASES, SETTLEMENT OR STIPULATION AND PROCESS FOR REVIEW BY THE POST COUNCIL

(1) If, in the course of the MAPA contested case proceeding, the parties reach a stipulated agreement or settlement, the parties must:

(a) put the agreement into writing, signed by the petitioner or respondent, as applicable, and the director;

(b) present the agreement to the POST Council for acceptance or rejection:

(i) if the council accepts the agreement by motion, then the agreement becomes the POST Council's final agency action;

(ii) if the council rejects the agreement, then the parties must provide the hearing examiner with an excerpt of the official record of the POST meeting in which the council rejected the agreement. The contested case proceeds as though there had been no agreement.

(2) By signing a stipulation or settlement agreement, all parties:

(a) indicate their understanding that all agreements reached during the contested case process are subject to the POST Council's approval and are not binding until the council has approved the agreement by seconded motion;

(b) waive their rights or privileges to raise any argument, objection, complaint, or attempt to disqualify or remove any POST Council member or hearing examiner based on that individual's having heard, discussed, or ruled on the agreement. By submitting an agreement to the hearing examiner and the council, all parties agree not to attempt to disqualify that hearing examiner or any member of the POST Council who considers the agreement or prevent them from ultimately hearing the case on the merits if the agreement is rejected.

 

History: 2-4-201, 2-15-2029, MCA; IMP, 44-4-403, MCA; NEW, 2014 MAR p. 2951, Eff. 12/12/14; AMD, 2017 MAR p. 1953, Eff. 10/28/17; AMD, 2024 MAR p. 607, Eff. 3/23/24.


 

 
MAR Notices Effective From Effective To History Notes
23-13-280 3/23/2024 Current History: 2-4-201, 2-15-2029, MCA; IMP, 44-4-403, MCA; NEW, 2014 MAR p. 2951, Eff. 12/12/14; AMD, 2017 MAR p. 1953, Eff. 10/28/17; AMD, 2024 MAR p. 607, Eff. 3/23/24.
23-13-246 10/28/2017 3/23/2024 History: 2-4-201, 2-15-2029, MCA; IMP, 44-4-403, MCA; NEW, 2014 MAR p. 2951, Eff. 12/12/14; AMD, 2017 MAR p. 1953, Eff. 10/28/17.
23-13-240 12/12/2014 10/28/2017 History: 2-4-201, 2-15-2029, MCA; IMP, 44-4-403, MCA; NEW, 2014 MAR p. 2951, Eff. 12/12/14.
Home  |   Search  |   About Us  |   Contact Us  |   Help  |   Disclaimer  |   Privacy & Security