HOME    SEARCH    ABOUT US    CONTACT US    HELP   
           
Prev Next

36.12.1902    CHANGE APPLICATION - HISTORIC USE

(1) The description of the historic information is related to a date that is dependent on the type of water right being changed. The following dates are applicable for each type of water right:

(a) historic information for a statement of claim must be described as it was used prior to July 1, 1973, unless the Water Right Claim was subject to a previous change in which case it is the date of completion of the change;

(b) historic information for a provisional permit must be described as it was

used at the filing date of the completion notice;

(c) historic information for a certificate of water right must be described as it

was used at the filing date of the completion notice;

(d) historic information for an exempt or nonfiled water right must be

described as it was completed prior to July 1, 1973; and

(e) when a change application has been granted on or after July 1, 1973, the department may request additional historic information for a statement of claim as it was used prior to July 1, 1973.

(2) Final Water Court approved stipulations and master's reports related to the water right being changed must be referenced with the application; however, this information or an abstract of a water right from the department or the Montana Water Court by itself is not sufficient to prove the existence or extent of the historical use.

(3) The amount of water being changed for each water right cannot exceed or increase the flow rate historically diverted under the historic use, nor exceed or increase the historic volume consumptively used under the existing use.

(a) The department may use column H in Table 1 for proposed irrigation to compare the historic consumptive use (HCU) to the amount of water being changed.

(4) The department shall compare historical acres irrigated to acres identified as irrigated in the Water Resources Survey, if available for the place of use. If the Water Resources Survey does not support the historical irrigation alleged in the application, the applicant shall explain why. Information from irrigation journals, logs, or old aerial photographs can be submitted for consideration.

(5) For an application to change multiple irrigation water rights, the total number of acres for each water right located within the place of use must be identified.

(6) For an application to change water rights that overlap the historic place of use, an applicant shall include those water rights in the change application or shall explain how each of the water rights has been historically used and how the unchanged water rights will be used if the change authorization were granted. If water will continue to be used at the historic place of use, the applicant shall explain how the continued use will not increase the combined historic maximum diverted flow rate, the historic diverted volume, and the historic consumptive volume.

(7) The department will corroborate the historic use, including the following of each water right being changed:

(a) water right number and the priority date;

(b) most recent year the water right was used;

(c) historic point of diversion;

(d) historic period of diversion;

(e) historic means of diversion;

(f) typical historic diversion schedule and operation pattern;

(g) means of conveyance;

(h) historic ditch capacity;

(i) maximum historic flow rate diverted from each point of diversion and how the amount was determined;

(j) historic place of use for each purpose;

(k) maximum number of acres historically irrigated;

(l) typical historic period of use for each purpose;

(m) annual or monthly historic diverted volume and how this amount was determined;

(n) the annual or monthly historic consumptive volume for each purpose;

(i) for irrigation, an applicant may choose to use the methodology described in (16); and

(ii) for irrigation, an applicant who chooses not to use the methodology described in (16), shall provide the factual basis for the historic consumptive volume calculation and why the historic consumptive use is less than or greater than the methodology described in (16);

(o) the historic efficiency including the diversion, conveyance, and overall system;

(p) the legal land description of a reservoir;

(q) the maximum volume in acre-feet of stored water;

(r) evaporation loss of stored water (evaporation standards can be found in ARM 36.12.116);

(s) maximum number of times a reservoir was filled during a year; and

(t) maximum period of time when water was legally collected for storage.

(8) The following information may be used by the department to establish the requirements under (7):

(a) aerial photographs depicting irrigated land:

(i) 1979, 1997, and 2005 photos showing the irrigated land;

(b) aerial or other photographs showing diversion or conveyance structures;

(c) Water Resources Survey book information;

(d) Water Resources Survey field notes;

(e) water commissioner field notes;

(f) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) information, such as field specific soils information;

(g) affidavits from persons with first-hand knowledge of historic use;

(h) calculation of historic ditch capacities;

(i) description of irrigation equipment, field treatments, means of conveyance, control structures, and other onsite features related to water use;

(j) description of water supply availability;

(k) log books or diaries of previous irrigators or farm operations, crop yield records, or diversion records; or

(l) an evaluation of the seniority of the water right in relation to other users.

(9) The annual or monthly historic diverted volume must be based on the appropriator's typical historic operation of their diversion, irrigation, and harvest schedule throughout the period of diversion and the period of use. If applicable, in addition to the information required in 36.12.1902(7), if a secondary diversion from a ditch or reservoir exists, an applicant shall identify the diversion means and the typical operation of that secondary diversion.

(10) The department shall calculate the historic diverted volume for water rights with the purpose of irrigation using the following equation: Historic Diverted Volume = (Volumehistoric consumptive use/On-farm efficiency) + Volumeconveyance loss:

(a) "conveyance loss" means the portion of water diverted at the headgate that does not arrive at the irrigated place of use due to seepage and evapotranspiration from the ditch;

(b) "seepage loss" means ((flow area)*(ditch length)*(loss rate)*(days))/43,560 ft2/ac; and

(c) "on-farm efficiency" refers to the percent of the water delivered to the field that is used by the crop.

(11) If the applicant chooses not to use the methodology in (10), they shall provide additional information on the Historic Water Use Addendum.

(12) Historic consumptive volume must be based on the acre-feet of water used for the beneficial purpose, such as water transpired by growing vegetation, evaporated from soils or water surfaces, or incorporated into products that do not return to ground or surface water.

(13) The following may be used to calculate ditch capacity, historic available water supply, and reservoir capacity:

(a) Manning's equation;

(b) Orsborn's equation;

(c) Blaney-Criddle equation; and

(d) the department will determine the acceptability of other reports or methods on a case-by-case basis.

(14) The historic consumptive use methodology that the department shall use to determine historic consumptive use for water rights with a purpose of irrigation is based on data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), and generated using the USDA NRCS Irrigation Water Requirements (IWR) program. If the applicant chooses not to accept the methodology used by the department, the applicant shall provide additional information on the Historic Water Use Addendum.

(15) IWR Data for Seasonal Alfalfa Evapotranspiration County Management Factor are shown in Table 1 and will be used by the department to identify the historic consumptive volume unless additional information is provided by the applicant on the Historic Water Use Addendum. If this table is used to establish the historic consumptive volume, the department will recognize that volume as a reasonable calculation, unless a valid objection is received which offers proof that the volume is inaccurate.

(16) To determine the historic consumptive volume using the table, the department will complete the following steps:

(a) determine which weather station (column B) is the most representative for the place of use (column C). The most representative weather station may not be in the county of the place of use, but must be nearby and about the same elevation and climatic conditions as the irrigated acres. A map showing the weather stations is located on the Internet at:https://dnrc.mt.gov/_docs/water/Water-Rights-Forms/IWR_weatherstation_location_map.pdf;

(b) find the evapotranspiration inches based on whether the historic irrigation is flood, wheeline, handline, or center pivot, to estimate the historic IWR (columns D or E);

(c) identify the county in which the irrigated acres are located to determine the county management factor percentage (column F or G);

(d) multiply the IWR estimate found in column D or E by the management factor percentage in column F or G. The result is the number of inches used per irrigated acre;

(e) multiply the number of total acres within the historic place of use by the county adjusted inches used per irrigated acre calculated in (d) above to determine the historic consumptive inches for those acres; and

(f) divide the cumulative historic consumptive inches from (e) by 12 to determine the cumulative historic consumptive acre-feet for the total acres.

(g) If the historic consumptive volume determined by this methodology exceeds the historic diverted amount, the department may request additional information in order to resolve the discrepancy. This may result in a reduction of the consumptive volume.

Table 1 - Montana County Weather Station IWR Data for Seasonal Alfalfa Evapotranspiration and Montana County Management Factor.

Column A

County

Column B

Weather Station

Column C

Elevation

Column D

IWR

Flood Irrigation, Wheeline & Handline

Seasonal ET (inches)

Column E

IWR

Center Pivot Irrigation

Seasonal ET (inches)

Column F

Management Factor Percentage

1964 � 1973

(pre-July 1, 1973 HCU)

Column G

Management

Factor

Percentage

1973 � 2006

(post-July 1, 1973 HCU)

Column H

Management Factor Percentage

1997 � 2006

(proposed use)

Beaverhead

Dillon

5239

18.34

20.74

63.7%

82.8%

88.3%

Wisdom

6060

7.34

9.29

Jackson

6480

8.35

10.30

Lakeview

6710

8.39

10.67

Lima

6583

13.75

16.01

Big Horn

Busby

3430

20.32

22.88

55.4%

78.7%

88.1%

Hardin

2905

27.46

29.96

Hysham 25

3100

20.25

22.86

Wyola

3750

19.19

21.89

Yellowtail Dam

3305

28.07

31.30

Blaine

Chinook

2420

20.80

23.57

58.7%

63.6%

66.0%

Harlem

2362

21.62

24.27

Broadwater

Townsend

3840

19.42

21.88

69.2%

79.5%

87.1%

Trident

4040

20.64

23.31

Carbon

Joliet

3776

22.41

25.12

58.3%

66.8%

70.8%

Red Lodge

5500

15.57

18.41

Carter

Ekalaka

3425

20.13

23.14

38.4%

54.7%

54.1%

Ridgeway

3320

20.28

23.01

Cascade

Cascade 20

4600

14.12

16.63

57.3%

70.0%

78.8%

Cascade 5

3360

17.90

20.75

Great Falls

3675

19.78

22.55

Neihart

4945

12.17

15.08

Sun River

3340

18.10

20.65

Chouteau

Big Sandy

2700

21.52

24.37

52.5%

64.9%

77.9%

Fort Benton

2640

21.98

24.75

Geraldine

3130

20.30

23.27

Iliad

2950

21.55

24.27

Loma

2700

22.64

25.37

Shonkin

4300

13.32

16.70

Custer

Miles City

2628

26.68

29.55

54.5%

72.0%

81.1%

Mizpah

2480

23.80

26.57

Powderville

2800

24.83

27.68

Dawson

Glendive

2076

26.01

28.99

56.8%

63.6%

72.0%

Deer Lodge

No weather station

See appropriate adjacent county

Column A

County

Column B

Weather Station

Column C

Elevation

Column D

IWR

Flood Irrigation, Wheeline & Handline

Seasonal ET (inches)

Column E

IWR

Center Pivot Irrigation

Seasonal ET (inches)

Column F

Management Factor Percentage

1964 � 1973

(pre-July 1, 1973 HCU)

Column G

Management

Factor

Percentage

1973 � 2006

(post-July 1, 1973 HCU)

Column H

Management Factor Percentage

1997 � 2006

(proposed use)

Fallon

Plevna

2780

22.48

25.34

47.6%

47.8%

47.6%

Fergus

Denton

3620

15.39

18.12

48.8%

65.8%

68.3%

Lewistown

4167

15.54

18.44

Roy

3450

19.94

22.78

Winifred

3240

17.86

20.75

Flathead

Creston

2949

14.97

17.81

87.6%

94.5%

96.6%

Hungry Horse Dam

3160

14.66

18.06

Kalispell

2972

16.45

19.03

Olney

3165

12.50

15.16

Polebridge

3600

10.20

12.50

West Glacier

3154

13.74

16.78

Whitefish

3100

15.74

18.61

Gallatin

Bozeman Exp Farm

4775

16.84

19.55

73.5%

92.1%

98.6%

Bozeman MT State

4913

18.42

21.39

Hebgen Dam

6667

10.09

12.77

Garfield

Cohagen

2710

22.36

24.99

43.4%

50.6%

46.1%

Jordan

2661

23.58

26.32

Mosby

2750

24.51

27.34

Glacier

Babb

4300

12.12

14.87

59.7%

73.6%

73.9%

Cut Bank

3855

16.01

18.60

Del Bonita

4340

14.61

17.30

East Glacier

4810

10.60

13.26

St Mary

4560

13.64

16.60

Golden Valley

Ryegate

4440

17.60

20.17

62.6%

65.5%

64.6%

Granite

Philipsburg Ranger Station

5270

12.90

15.26

86.5%

87.4%

96.6%

Hill

Fort Assinniboine

2613

22.42

25.20

54.1%

59.8%

60.4%

Guilford

2820

19.54

22.06

Havre

2585

20.94

23.46

Simpson

2815

19.67

22.13

Jefferson

Boulder

4904

17.08

19.47

61.0%

77.9%

81.1%

Judith Basin

Moccasin Exp Station

4243

16.17

19.06

49.3%

68.0%

68.8%

Raynesford

4220

16.14

19.05

Stanford

4860

16.74

19.69

Lake

Bigfork

2910

17.37

20.61

55.0%

69.2%

68.7%

Polson

2949

20.46

23.23

Polson Kerr Dam

2730

21.37

24.08

Column A

County

Column B

Weather Station

Column C

Elevation

Column D

IWR

Flood Irrigation, Wheeline & Handline

Seasonal ET (inches)

Column E

IWR

Center Pivot Irrigation

Seasonal ET (inches)

Column F

Management Factor Percentage

1964 � 1973

(pre-July 1, 1973 HCU)

Column G

Management

Factor

Percentage

1973 � 2006

(post-July 1, 1973 HCU)

Column H

Management Factor Percentage

1997 � 2006

(proposed use)

St Ignatius

2940

19.53

22.33

Lewis & Clark

Augusta

4070

17.51

20.13

60.1%

79.0%

79.7%

Austin

4790

15.41

17.96

Helena

3828

20.23

22.69

Holter Dam

3490

23.88

26.61

Lincoln Ranger Station

4575

12.87

15.22

Liberty

Chester

3132

19.28

21.74

54.8%

65.7%

63.9%

Joplin

3300

19.01

21.40

Tiber Dam

2850

22.98

25.46

Lincoln

Eureka Ranger Station

2532

20.63

23.26

47.1%

56.3%

58.8%

Fortine

3000

16.09

18.69

Libby Ranger Station

2096

21.20

23.71

Libby

3600

11.06

13.36

Troy

1950

19.90

22.68

Madison

Alder

5800

14.33

16.75

65.2%

79.0%

83.3%

Ennis

4953

17.19

19.71

Glen

5050

17.81

20.01

Norris

4750

20.88

23.97

Twin Bridges

4777

16.98

19.22

Virginia City

5770

15.57

18.13

McCone

Brockway

2630

20.74

23.35

43.7%

55.0%

60.6%

Circle

2480

22.23

25.01

Fort Peck Power Plant

2070

25.37

28.16

Vida

2400

21.74

24.65

Meagher

Lennep

5880

11.93

14.38

57.3%

70.4%

78.3%

Martinsdale

4800

15.19

17.73

White Sulpher Spr

5060

16.41

18.89

Mineral

St Regis Ranger Stn

2680

17.61

20.05

56.1%

63.3%

63.6%

Superior

2710

21.94

24.54

Missoula

Lindbergh Lake

4320

14.63

17.22

69.5%

67.5%

69.4%

Missoula

3420

18.85

21.49

Missoula WSO AP

3199

19.45

21.89

Potomac

3620

14.05

16.26

Column A

County

Column B

Weather Station

Column C

Elevation

Column D

IWR

Flood Irrigation, Wheeline & Handline

Seasonal ET (inches)

Column E

IWR

Center Pivot Irrigation

Seasonal ET (inches)

Column F

Management Factor Percentage

1964 � 1973

(pre-July 1, 1973 HCU)

Column G

Management

Factor

Percentage

1973 � 2006

(post-July 1, 1973 HCU)

Column H

Management Factor Percentage

1997 � 2006

(proposed use)

Seeley Lake Ranger Station

4100

14.86

17.31

Musselshell

Melstone

2920

24.22

27.17

50.0%

58.7%

56.2%

Roundup

3386

23.98

26.79

Park

Cooke City

7460

8.68

11.63

56.9%

66.1%

67.5%

Gardiner

5275

22.46

24.70

Livingston

4870

16.59

19.41

Livingston FAA AP

4656

18.63

21.39

Wilsall

5840

13.20

16.01

Petroleum

Flatwillow

3133

22.27

25.01

44.0%

50.0%

43.2%

Phillips

Content

2340

21.15

23.97

54.7%

54.7%

54.9%

Malta 35

2650

20.28

22.99

Malta 7

2262

21.61

24.39

Port of Morgan

2830

20.15

22.72

Saco

2180

20.13

22.70

Zortman

4660

14.38

17.40

Pondera

Conrad

3550

16.93

19.42

71.4%

81.0%

83.7%

Valier

3810

18.31

20.96

Powder River

Biddle

3597

21.87

24.66

38.5%

49.3%

53.3%

Broadus

3032

23.03

25.69

Moorhead

3220

23.72

26.42

Sonnette

3900

18.32

20.96

Powell

Deer Lodge

4678

13.14

15.32

77.6%

90.0%

100.0%1

Ovando

4109

12.28

14.43

Prairie

Mildred

2510

22.92

25.58

59.6%

73.6%

84.3%

Terry

2248

22.82

25.47

Terry 21

3260

18.65

21.34

Ravalli

Darby

3880

18.91

21.44

79.5%

88.6%

96.1%

Hamilton

3529

19.93

22.34

Stevensville

3380

19.19

21.44

Sula

4475

12.09

14.42

Western Ag Research

3600

19.82

22.15

Richland

Savage

1990

23.61

26.59

56.0%

72.9%

88.4%

Sidney

1931

22.49

25.45

Roosevelt

Bredette

2638

19.99

22.86

46.5%

64.9%

74.6%

Culbertson

1942

20.84

23.73

Wolf Point

1985

24.16

27.03

Column A

County

Column B

Weather Station

Column C

Elevation

Column D

IWR

Flood Irrigation, Wheeline & Handline

Seasonal ET (inches)

Column E

IWR

Center Pivot Irrigation

Seasonal ET (inches)

Column F

Management Factor Percentage

1964 � 1973

(pre-July 1, 1973 HCU)

Column G

Management

Factor

Percentage

1973 � 2006

(post-July 1, 1973 HCU)

Column H

Management Factor Percentage

1997 � 2006

(proposed use)

Rosebud

Birney

3160

24.57

27.29

47.7%

67.7%

72.7%

Brandenberg

2770

23.83

26.52

Colstrip

3218

23.32

26.10

Forsythe

2520

25.17

28.04

Ingomar

2780

23.18

25.83

Rock Springs

3020

21.35

23.93

Sanders

Heron

2240

14.82

17.73

58.8%

69.1%

62.8%

Thompson Falls Power

2380

22.49

25.36

Trout Cr Ranger Station

2356

16.60

19.40

Sheridan

Medicine Lake

1975

21.64

24.49

44.8%

68.5%

80.7%

Plentywood

2063

20.64

23.48

Raymond Border Station

2384

19.13

22.04

Redstone

2300

17.86

20.58

Westby

2120

18.10

21.033

Silverbow

Butte FAA AP

5545

14.73

17.06

68.8%

90.3%

93.6%

Divide

5350

15.25

17.58

Stillwater

Columbus

3602

22.31

25.09

46.5%

62.9%

72.5%

Mystic Lake

6544

13.57

16.57

Nye

4840

15.00

17.93

Rapelje

4125

20.35

23.07

Sweet Grass

Big Timber

4100

20.60

23.47

44.7%

53.6%

49.4%

Melville

5370

12.83

15.49

Teton

Blackleaf

4240

14.74

17.34

68.8%

80.2%

88.4%

Choteau Airport

3845

20.53

23.07

Fairfield

3980

19.10

21.76

Gibson Dam

4724

13.57

16.22

Toole

Goldbutte

3498

16.30

18.96

51.8%

66.5%

70.8%

Sunburst

3610

18.74

21.46

Sweetgrass

3466

18.22

21.22

Treasure

Hysham

2660

25.01

27.78

53.4%

75.2%

91.5%

Valley

Glasgow WSO AP

2293

23.48

26.12

57.9%

66.6%

74.9%

Hinsdale

2670

22.18

25.25

Opheim 10

2878

16.19

18.86

Opheim 16

3258

16.73

19.34

Column A

County

Column B

Weather Station

Column C

Elevation

Column D

IWR

Flood Irrigation, Wheeline & Handline

Seasonal ET (inches)

Column E

IWR

Center Pivot Irrigation

Seasonal ET (inches)

Column F

Management Factor Percentage

1964 � 1973

(pre-July 1, 1973 HCU)

Column G

Management

Factor

Percentage

1973 � 2006

(post-July 1, 1973 HCU)

Column H

Management Factor Percentage

1997 � 2006

(proposed use)

Wheatland

Harlowton

4162

17.83

20.56

46.6%

58.7%

54.4%

Judith Gap

4573

13.77

16.40

Wibaux

Carlyle

3030

19.87

22.75

See appropriate adjacent county

Wibaux

2696

18.69

21.50

Yellowstone

Billings Water Plant

3097

26.16

28.92

59.5%

71.4%

77.8%

Billings WSO

3648

25.49

28.22

Huntley Exp Station

3034

21.92

24.61

1The 1997-2006 county management factor was calculated to be slightly greater than 100%, therefore the 1997-2006 Management Factor is set to 100%.

(17) In addition to the amount determined by the methodology described in (14) and (15), the department will add the following consumptive loss components to account for irrecoverable losses at the field:

(a) 5% of the volume applied to the field for flood systems; and

(b) 10% of the volume applied to the field for sprinkler systems.

History: 85-2-112, 85-2-113, 85-2-302, MCA; IMP, 85-2-302, 85-2-401, 85-2-402, 85-2-407, 85-2-408, 85-2-436, MCA; NEW, 2004 MAR p. 3036, Eff. 1/1/05; AMD, 2009 MAR p. 2259, Eff. 11/26/09; AMD, 2012 MAR p. 2071, Eff. 10/12/12; AMD, 2013 MAR p. 1344, Eff. 7/26/13.

Home  |   Search  |   About Us  |   Contact Us  |   Help  |   Disclaimer  |   Privacy & Security